This is not one of the Seven Simple Questions that I mentioned earlier. This is a question that stands all by itself, alone. It precedes the Seven Simple Questions, and creates a context for them. Not enough people are asking this preceding question, much less answering it.
This was just one long whiny rant about the demise of good thinking. Are there salient points in the book? Yes, there are declining scores in literacy and math and people often lack good critical analysis. But should we argue for a return to rationalism?
Unfortunatley this exactly what LeGualt is trying to do. He is very critical of postmodernity, radical feminism, environmentalism for their lack of thoughtful grappling with the facts. LeGault I actually am a student of critical thinking and I am not very impressed with his critical thinking skills.
Here is why I do NOT recommend his book. The point he is criticizing is not accurate, and the illustration he uses to prove his point is a very poor comparison of BlinkThink vs critical thinking skills, which is what his book is really about.
In the end, it is crystal clear why he named his b Unfortunately for Mr. In the end, it is crystal clear why he named his book Think and took aim at Blinkhe wants readers to buy his book and tying to a well known author will entice some to read his book.
However, in the end, his book is not a criticism of the book Blink but merely a dissertation of how people need to exercise critical thinking skills and the warning that our society is not going in that direction. Second, his book is boring. Gladwell does a masterful job of taking scientific research about how the brain works and simplifying it so that the average person can start to understand more complex science.
LeGault should applaud rather than criticize the work that Mr. In fact, one walks away after reading a Gladwell book with the desire to think more and to question more rather than jumping to quick conclusion.
Even in his book, Blink, Mr. Gladwell was not encouraging people to walk around making snap judgments. He was saying that some people after a lot of experience in certain fields have the ability to quickly come to conclusions. LeGault totally missed that point.
LeGault wants to sell books and picking on a well know author, even dishonestly, helped him do it. Third, one gets the impression that there are very few original thoughts from Mr.
He cites so many sources that one starts to want to read his sources rather than his boring book. It reads like a research paper and his examples are brief and often boring. Gladwell understood that to write a book about a boring subjectpsychology and sociologyone must use interesting examples and studies to keep the reader interested.
LeGault has a chapter on "fear" and how fear prevents people from thinking rationally. However, he does little to make it interesting. He could have described studies done to show how fear makes people do certain things.
Instead he just talks about it as if we should stop fearing and get our emotions under control. Show us the science. Lastly, the only group his book is good for is the group that is least likely to read itthe non-critical thinkers.
If you read books like Mr. You are already well on your way to thinking critically. If, on the other hand, you read mostly novels then this book could benefit you, yet I would recommend Mr.
Because, after all, even a bad book teaches us somethingwhat authors to avoid.Critical Thinking Regarding the Book Blink Essay Critical thinking is defined as purposeful, reflective judgment that manifests itself in giving reasoned and fair-minded consideration to the evidence, conceptualizations, methods, contexts, and standards in order .
Ashley The book I have has, "with a new introduction by the author," on the front cover and, "With new information reflecting the latest research, this tenth more The book I have has, "with a new introduction by the author," on the front cover and, "With new information reflecting the latest research, this tenth anniversary edition updates Goleman's thinking and answers key questions posed.
Critical Thinking Regarding the Book Blink Essay Words | 7 Pages. Critical thinking is defined as purposeful, reflective judgment that manifests itself in giving reasoned and fair-minded consideration to the evidence, conceptualizations, methods, contexts, and standards in order to decide what to believe or what to do (Facione, ).
Jeff & Nancy COACHING LEADERS BLOG November 13, - Fit to Lead - The Neurology of Relationships series There is a a dimension to leadership we seldom consider when asking are we fit to lead? This is a physiological question, not a philosophical one? Dartmouth Writing Program support materials - including development of argument.
Fundamentals of Critical Reading and Effective Writing. Mind Mirror Projects: A Tool for Integrating Critical Thinking into the English Language Classroom (), by Tully, in English Teaching Forum, State Department, Number 1 Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum Project, Metropolitan Community College.
Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking () is Malcolm Gladwell's second book. It presents in popular science format research from psychology and behavioral economics on the adaptive unconscious: mental processes that work rapidly and automatically from relatively little grupobittia.com considers both the strengths of the adaptive unconscious, for example in expert judgment, and its.